Tag Archives: xbee

20161214_102044s

Moteino Energy Monitor Shield

Moving from the ESP8266 world I’ve been diving lately I still love the simplicity of battery powered Moteino nodes. You might know I’m migrating my XBee-based sensor network at home to an RFM69 one. So long I have changed my door monitor and my weather station. They are sensing and reporting to my RFM69GW, an ESP8266 bridge board using a custom firmware.

Time to go for the power monitor. A long time ago (actually 2 years but it really feels like a century ago) I was living in a big city and we had one of those fancy “smart meters” with a LED pulsing 4000 times every kWh. Back then I used an Arduino micro to count the LED pulses and report the power every minute through an XBee link.

But now I live in a small town and my house electrical system is somewhat “old”. My power meter comes from somewhen in the 60s (maybe not so old). So a non-invasive current sensor makes a bit more sense (ehem).

Continue reading

20161009_021036s

Low power weather station with BME280 and Moteino

A few weeks ago I wrote about my new door monitor. It was the first step towards migrating my XBee based wireless sensors network to RFM69 radios using Moteino platform by LowPowerLab. I was truly impressed by the low power consumption so I committed myself to keep on working with them.

Coincidentally Felix Russo, the guy behind LowPowerLab, released the new version of it’s Weather Shield for Moteino. So it was time to update (or completely revamp) my trusty Arduino FIO based weather station… and last week I received a parcel from LowPowerLab with a pair of shields to play with: the new WeatherShield R2 and the PowerShield R3. They are both compatible with the Moteino (off course).

Moteino PowerShield and WeatherShield

From left to right: PowerShield R3, Moteino and the new WeatherShield R2

Continue reading

20160826_132916x

Moteino Door Monitor

Some days ago I posted about the RFM69 to MQTT gateway based on the ESP8266 I am working on. Over these days I’ve been fine tuning the gateway at the same time I was migrating one of my home sensors to Moteino: the Door Monitor. The previous version was based on an XBee radio and has been on duty for almost 3 years and a half. Real life battery time has been around 3 months for a CR2032 coin cell, which is not bad at all, but still…

Aside from using a Moteino and a RFM69 868MHz radio instead of the XBee, I have reduced the components list by moving hardware logic to software logic. This means using sleeping capabilities of both the ATMega328 and the RFM69 and coding in a clever way to reduce awake time.

Continue reading

20160819_002338x

RFM69 WIFI Gateway

Some 3 years ago I started building my own wireless sensor network at home. The technology I used at the moment has proven to be the right choice, mostly because it is flexible and modular.

MQTT is the keystone of the network. The publisher-subscriber pattern gives the flexibility to work on small, replaceable, simple components that can be attached or detached from the network at any moment. Over this time is has gone through some changes, like switching from a series of python daemons to Node-RED to manage persistence, notifications and reporting to several “cloud” services.

But MQTT talks TCP, which means you need some kind of translators for other “languages”. The picture below is from one of my firsts posts about my Home Monitoring System, and it shows some components I had working at the time.

Home WSN version 2

All those gears in the image are those translators, sometimes called drivers, sometimes bridges, sometimes gateways. Most of them have been replaced by Node-RED nodes. But not all of them. This is the story of one of those gateways.

Continue reading

Ciseco XRF modules & LLAP Protocol

In my last post about counting events with Arduino and PCF8583 I talked about this “yet another weather station” project I was working on last summer. The station was deployed in the garden of a cute apartment we rented in an old “masia” near Olot, 100 km north of Barcelona. It is in the mountainside, surrounded by woods and 10 minutes walking from the near town. It has a beautiful garden with plenty of space. We spent there most of the summer but now we are still driving there on the weekends. It’s colder, sometimes freezing, and when it rains, well, it does rain. Off course it was the perfect excuse to build another weather station.

One decision I had to take when designing the new weather station was how to send data from the nice housing I built for it in the garden to my home server in Barcelona. I needed some kind of internet connection in the house but that’s something I will talk about in another post. I could have used a RN-XV WIFI module like the one I’m using for the rentalito but it’s expensive and I really wanted something simpler to use.

I had already a couple of Ciseco’s XRF radios and decided to give them a try (they are now selling version 2 of theses radios, I have v1.5 modules). These modules provide an easy way to create a wireless transparent RF serial connection between two nodes, no need to configure anything. They have a better range than Bluetooth, WIFI or Zigbee, since they use a longer wavelength to operate (868 to 915 MHz). Off course they can do a lot more than that. They are based on Texas Instruments’ CC1110, a low-power System-on-Chip and you can write and load your own firmware on them. Ciseco provides a series of closed-source firmwares (they call them “personalities“) for these radios, focused on different sensor inputs. You can find more information in the openmicros.org wiki, there is enough to spend a couple of hours reading but I have to say the wiki is kind of a mess, although they have improved it a lot in the last year or so.

Ciseco XRF wireless RF radio

Ciseco XRF wireless RF radio v1.5

Anyway, out-of-the-box these modules are a transparent RF link and their footprint is compatible with XBee modules, so you can use them with your XBee Explorers, Arduino FIOs,… (well played Ciseco). Like in my previous weather station I decided to use an Arduino FIO as a controller (DC-IN, LiPo battery backed, XBee socket,…) so I just stacked one of these modules on it. Inside the house I prepared the “gateway”: an Arduino Leonardo, with an Ethernet shield and a Wireless Shield with another XRF module. The Ethernet shield connected the Arduino to a TP-LINK WR703N WIFI router loaded with openWRT with a 3G USB stick. The small router provides internet connection to the Arduino and to any other device inside the house via WIFI. The WR703N is a really awesome, small and hackable piece of hardware. But as I have already said, you will have to wait for the whole picture of the connection between the weather station and my home server, I want to focus on the radios and the protocol now.

Now that we have the hardware it’s time to think about the message. Ciseco promotes the use a a light-weigth protocol named, well, Lightweight Local Automation Protocol, or LLAP. You can read all about it in the LLAP Reference Guide in the openmicros.org wiki. The protocol defines two node types: controller and device; a message format formed by a start byte (‘a’), device identification (2 bytes) and a payload (9 bytes); and a communications protocol (address allocation, request/response pairs,…). The different “personalities” provided by Ciseco use this message protocol to report sensor values and they can even be configured remotely this way. But Ciseco also provides an Arduino LLAPSerial library so anyone can easily create LLAP devices using XRF radios or other products from the company that integrate a MUC.

Ciseco LLAP library for Arduino is OK, and it works, but it looks like a draft, something you can use to build upon it. So I decided to do just that. You can checkout my version of the LLAPSerial library for Arduino from Bitbucket. Initially I did a fork of Ciseco version but finally I decided to break the dependency with it because some features I added made it incompatible with the original one, although the protocol is 100% backwards compatible. The differences are summarized in the README file but here you have a quick-view:

  • Removed power management code (this library focuses on LLAP protocol and messaging)
  • Added support to use different Hardware and Software serial ports
  • Provided a unique overloaded sendMessage method that supports sending char/int/float messages
  • Provided a way to broadcast messages (see below) using special device ID ‘..’
  • Defined the “coordinator” node, which will always process all messages, regardless the destination
  • Disallow CHDEVID to coordinator nodes
  • Major renaming and refactoring (sorry)
  • Added doc comments
  • Address negotiation and persistence NEW!!

This sample code shows the use of the library to report data from a DHT22 temperature and humidity sensor using LLAP.

#include <LLAPSerial.h>
#include <DHT22.h>

#define DEVICE_ID "DI"
#define DHT_PIN 2

// DHT22 connections:
// Connect pin 1 (on the left) of the sensor to 3.3V
// Connect pin 2 of the sensor to whatever your DHT_PIN is
// Connect pin 4 (on the right) of the sensor to GROUND
// Connect a 10K resistor from pin 2 (data) to pin 1 (power) of the sensor

DHT22 dht(DHT_PIN);
LLAPSerial LLAP(Serial);

void setup() {

   // This should match your radio baud rate
   Serial.begin(115200);

   // This device has a static ID
   LLAP.begin(DEVICE_ID);

}

void loop() {

   static unsigned long lastTime = millis();
   if (millis() - lastTime >= 10000) {

      lastTime = millis();

      DHT22_ERROR_t errorCode = dht.readData();
      if (errorCode == DHT_ERROR_NONE) {
         float t = dht.getTemperatureC();
         float h = dht.getHumidity();
         LLAP.sendMessage("HUM", h, 1);
         LLAP.sendMessage("TMP", t, 1);
      } else {
         LLAP.sendMessage("ERROR", (int) errorCode);
      }

   }

}

There are some things missing from the library, being the main one the address allocation feature the protocol describes (also missing from Ciseco’s implementation). I will try to add it soon. In the meantime feel free to use any of the two libraries and enjoy the simplicity of LLAP. The last version of the library supports address negotiation between the nodes and the coordinator following the guidelines at LLAP Reference Guide, including address persistence, so a node will keep its address after a reboot.